I authorize this site to connect to my social media profile
When you log in for the first time using a social media account, we collect your account public profile information shared by the social media provider, based on your privacy settings. We receive your email address to automatically create an account for you on our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Connect withD
I authorize this site to connect to my social media profile
When you log in for the first time using a social media account, we collect your account public profile information shared by the social media provider, based on your privacy settings. We receive your email address to automatically create an account for you on our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
CMM
February 26, 2022 11:58 pm
I am reading William Goode’s pamphlet, THE DOCTRINE of THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND AS TO THE EFFECTS OF BAPTISM IN THE CASE OF INFANTS (2nd edition, 1850). He is attempting to deal with the Gorham controversy, about the meaning of baptism in the Church of England, and he brings mountains of evidence to show that Cranmer and others who were involved in drawing up the formularies of the Church of England, including the Articles, were Reformed in understanding — what we would, by 1850, call Calvinists.
wpDiscuz
I am reading William Goode’s pamphlet, THE DOCTRINE of THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND AS TO THE EFFECTS OF BAPTISM IN THE CASE OF INFANTS (2nd edition, 1850). He is attempting to deal with the Gorham controversy, about the meaning of baptism in the Church of England, and he brings mountains of evidence to show that Cranmer and others who were involved in drawing up the formularies of the Church of England, including the Articles, were Reformed in understanding — what we would, by 1850, call Calvinists.